![]() ![]() ![]() The path to full time hours is not guaranteed and is not always smooth. These contracts can negatively impact on leisure time and family life. This can undoubtedly create difficulties for family life and the planning of child care and other care responsibilities. Such people do not necessarily know what, if any, hours of work they will have in any particular week. They can be argued to benefit both employer and employee but recent public debate has begun to question the true cost of such contracts.Ĭritics maintain that people working zero-hour contracts too often lead an uncertain and insecure existence. They can give employees the flexibility they need to manage the demands of work and home life. ![]() They have some positives that include allowing managers the flexibility they need to cope with peaks and troughs in workload. The idea that zero-hour contracts can help people into work does have an element of truth to it. What is sometimes forgotten in the midst of all this political debate is the impact that the contracts can have on the people employed on them. On the Conservative side, they like the flexibility that zero hours contracts can give businesses and the route they can provide for getting people back into work. It seems that the Lib Dems, even though they are part of the coalition, also have concerns, given that one of their senior politicians, Business Minister Vince Cable, is carrying out a review of these contracts. Ed Miliband has made it clear that they would be one thing that would change if Labour comes to power. Zero-hour contracts are presently a topic of much political discussion and all the political parties are coming at them from different angles. Are zero-hour contracts good for the economy but bad for society? Or are they simply bad on both counts? ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |